Are the media advancing their own biased or prejudicial interests in their discussion of presidential nominees. The topic of this discussion in the NY Times is debt reduction; and the debate is focused upon who would make the better presidential candidate - Romney or Perry?
The question is - why is Ron Paul left out of the debate? He is by far the most credible on debt reduction and monetary policy; after all, he was the one who anticipated the crisis among them, and has retained the same position throughout his senate tenure. Does that make him a dogmatist? Plausibly, but at least he has values. The others will indoctrinate with their Conservative views, whilst blowing with the wind on most other issues. We might be looking at another Bush people. Vote careful! You are between a rock and a hard place. I personally hope you secede from the United, Dysfunctional States of America (UDSA) and form your old colony.
------------------------------------
Author
Andrew Sheldon
